Knowledge sharing among researchers within interdisciplinary communities may be critical for new discoveries. In spite of this, biologists tend to talk to biologists, economists tend to talk to economists, and psychologists tend to talk to psychologists. Co-locating them may be a helpful but insufficient step to generating multidisciplinary knowledge. Disciplinary subgroups hold contrary assumptions about the appropriate questions to be asked.
How can this be overcome? Kathleen L. McGinn, Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, argues that interdisciplinary communities must first attend to the compatibility of assumptions held by sub-groups within the field. Understanding may stem from the potential for members to recognize the relevance of others' findings to their own scholarship.
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Labels: Research Strategy |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment